Zirconia Implants: What We Know

WHAT WE KNOWThey are biocompatible and osseoconductive and can reduce plaque on the implant surface.
The Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry concluded that current research on zirconia indicates its biocompatibility with surrounding tissues. Zirconia also showed osseoconductive properties and demonstrated positive interaction with soft tissue. Notably, the literature states the material reduced plaque formation on the implant surface, promoting better healing and successful implant treatment. Moreover, recent studies reflect that zirconia osseointegrates as well as or, in some cases, better than titanium, which is partly due to the high level of contact between the implant material and the jawbone.

They have physical properties that make them attractive for implant dentistry.
Zirconia’s physical properties exhibit good flexural strength, resistance to fracture, a low modulus of elasticity, and low thermal conductivity, which make it desirable for implants.

They are an excellent material option for some patient segments.
The material is chemically inactive. Persons with metal allergies or sensitivities, or those who want metal-free dentistry in general, may choose a zirconia implant. Additionally, because they are not dark like their titanium counterparts, zirconia implants do not result in dark lines around the gingival margin, which is particularly problematic in patients who receive titanium implants and have thin gingival tissue.


Can zirconia implants last as long as titanium?
Zirconia is a relatively new material for implants, so there is a smaller amount of data about long-term success. By contrast, titanium dental implants have been studied for decades, leading to excellent data about their long-term use.3 However, research is ramping up on the longevity of zirconia implants. A 2020 study suggests clinicians are placing more zirconia implants because there is an increase documented in about 180% of the studies published from 2015 to 2020, and those studies reveal a survival rate of 87% to 100% at 7.8 years.4 By contrast, titanium implants have a 96.4% survival rate after 10 years.5 Time (and more clinical studies) will tell whether the same is true for zirconia implants.

Do 1-piece zirconia implants perform better than 2-piece?
Still, clinicians should only recommend 2-piece zirconia implants after informing the patient of a lack of long-term success data. However, 1-piece abutments have limitations, primarily the reduction of angulation options, which can interfere with osseointegration and stability and the mechanical properties of the materials. The lack of studies on 2-piece implants does little to answer the question as to whether they might perform better. A 2022 Clinical Oral Implants Research study suggests that a 2-piece zirconia implant had high survival rates for single teeth in posterior jaws.

Could mechanical properties degrade as zirconia implants age?
Low-temperature degradation (LTD) is a problem for ceramics. LTD occurs in the presence of moisture, hydrogen, and water on stabilized ceramics, resulting in loss of strength and the ceramic’s other beneficial advantages.9 Zirconia is affected by LTD, and more research is needed to understand LTD’s effect on strength, density, and toughness as well as the long-term survival rates of zirconia implants.

Would a combination of titanium and zirconia be a better material choice than one or the other?
A 2022 systematic review in Dentistry Journal suggests that although titanium, zirconia, and titanium-zirconia implants all had a similar performance for tissue response and behavior, the combination of titanium and zirconia did better than either the titanium or zirconia implants for survival rates, marginal bone loss, and bleeding on probing.

Will patients prefer them?
Clinical investigations are needed to determine patient satisfaction with zirconia implants.

Author(s) Source
Lively T Dental Products Report, August 10, 2023
This is a post of a scientific or business information. The information given here is checked thoroughly by “Implant-Register”. However we can´t be responsible for the content. The content usually is shortened to make it understandable for many. Read the linked original text if you are interested. Contact the publisher, if you have questions. You may inform us about changes of the information to improve the Register.
Comments: n/a
let us know