×

Search for:

SEARCH
PATIENTS
NEWS
SOCIETIES
EVENTS
MARKETPLACE
HOW TO USE
CONTACT

Acryl-IOL, hydrophil

05 EYE A ANATOMY EYE IMPLANTS IMPLANTS LENS IMPLANTS

Off

Acryl-IOL, hydrophob and preloaded »

search for whatever

Search for:

Statistics

Current on this page:
7541 Implants
861 Companies
579 Societies
15 Patient Information

Latest News

- Influence of institutional experience on results in hip and knee total arthroplasty
  September 3, 2020An analysis from the German arthroplasty registry (EPRD) Background The German Arthroplasty Registry, EPRD, has the ability to examine early factors influencing the probability of failure of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study analyses the influence of the overall experience of a hospital, as well as the change in supplier on the revision rate. Materials and methods A total of 164,903 cementless THA and 155,577 cemented TKA were in follow-up from 656 hospitals from 2012 to 2019. The number of arthroplasties performed per hospital per year was used as a surrogate parameter for institutional experience. This number was subdivided into 250, 251–500 and more than 500 for hip and knee per year and the overall revision rate was analysed. Additionally, the effects of the change of a major supplier of implant systems to a hospital were analysed. At least 70% of the documented implant components for each calendar quarter were used in that hospital to define the company as a major supplier. Results The overall revision rate for THA was 3.9% for hospitals with up to 250 arthroplasties per year, 3.3% for hospitals with 251–500 arthroplasties per year and 2.9% for hospitals performing over 500 surgeries per year (p < 0.0001). The revision rate for TKA was also significantly different between the three groups with 3.4, 3.3 and 2.7% (p < 0.0001). Changing the supplier of implant systems also showed a significant increase of the revision rate (p < 0.0001 for THA, p = 0.02 for TKA). Conclusion The institutional experience significantly influences short-term results in terms of the revision rate of hip and knee arthroplasty. Changing the implant system even in an experienced hospital has a major impact on the early revision rate and, therefore, needs careful transition. Author(s) Source Arnd Steinbrück A, Grimberg A, Melsheimer O, Jansson V Der Orthopäde, Volume 49, pages808–814(2020)DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-020-03963-z (deutsch) This is a post of a scientific or business information. The information given here is checked thoroughly by “Implant-Register”. However we can´t be responsible for the content. Contact the publisher, if you have questions. You may inform us about changes of the information to improve the Register. Comments: n/alet us know... Read more...
- Comparison of a polyethylene glycol membrane and a collagen membrane for the treatment of bone dehiscence defects
  September 2, 2020Comparison of a polyethylene glycol membrane and a collagen membrane for the treatment of bone dehiscence defects at bone level implants—A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial The aim of the present randomized, controlled clinical multicenter trial was to compare a polyethylene glycol (PEG) and a native collagen membrane (BG) for simultaneous guided bone regeneration at bony dehiscence‐type defects around bone level titanium implants. Material and methods The study enrolled 117 patients requiring implant treatment in the posterior maxilla or mandible with expected buccal bony dehiscence‐type defects at the placed titanium implants. According to a parallel groups design, defects were filled with a synthetic bone filler and randomly assigned to either PEG or BG membrane. Both membranes supported bone regeneration at dehiscence‐type defects and obtained vertical bone fill with a relative change in defect height of 59.7% (PEG) and 64.4% (BG); however, the non‐inferiority of PEG could not be shown. Author(s) Source Jung RE, Mihatovic I, Cordaro L, Windisch P, Friedmann A, Carrion JB, Sanchez IS, Hallman M, Quirynen M, Hammerle ChHF Clinical Oral Implant Research, 02.09.2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13657 This is a post of a scientific or business information. The information given here is checked thoroughly by “Implant-Register”. However we can´t be responsible for the content. The content usually is shortened to make it understandable for many. Read the linked original text if you are interested. Contact the publisher, if you have questions. You may inform us about changes of the information to improve the Register. Comments: n/alet us know... Read more...

New Implants

- Patent™ Implant
  May 2, 2020BRIEF PROFILE reg.: n/aregister now⇒ profile ⇒ full 01 application implant, compensation of dental root 02 specific transgingival height, hydrophilic surface, glassfiber post and core 03 company Zircon Medical AG 04 illustration n/a n/a implant topview surface X-ray 05 material ceramic 06 approvals X CE-Marking n/a FDA-Approval n/a ISO n/a DIN 07 regional directions n/a 08 last update 2020-05-02 not registered / this page is not approved by the provider “Brief Profile” shows a nonregistered implant. Information given here are checked thoroughly by “Implant-Register”. Illustrations refer to the company, if not shown differently. However we can not guarantee for any material or properties. Ask the manufacturer for such questions and give us the information to improve the Register. If there are pictures like logos or implants, they are taken from the companies website. The publishing company may inform us to hide them. No comments yet.... Read more...

New Companies

- Intact Vascular, Inc.
  September 10, 2020reg.: n/aregister now IMPLANTS U.S.A. product group cardiovascular implant products Tack Endovascular System® ATK implant above the knee BTK implant below the knee contact n/a This is a post of a nonregistered company. Information given here is checked thoroughly by “Implant-Register”. However we can not guarantee for any material, property or completeness. Ask the company for such questions and give us the information to improve the Register. If there are pictures like logos or implants, they may be taken from the companies website. The publishing company may inform us to improve or hide them.... Read more...

Latest glossary entries

MLD
ALD

These are 2 examples. For more, have a look in the Glossary!

forms for patients
forms for information
forms for companies
all services
make a donation
newsletter
tell me why
terms and conditions
glossary
who we are
privacy policy
impressum
legal

search all or any category

Search for:

Implantwiki 2018-2020 Theme by Themez WP

COVID-19
news

stay connected

don’t miss any news of the
Implant-Register,
tailored to your preferences

This website uses cookies. We're assuming this is okay for you, but you can log out if you prefer.I agree it´s not okay read more

Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.

Necessary

Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.